OpenStreetMap: A Minimally Controlled Environment

penStreetMap (OSM) is widely recognized as a collaborative platform for geospatial mapping, but it's often described as a "minimally controlled environment" due to several inherent characteristics in its structure and operation. Below are the key factors contributing to this description:

1. Open Contribution

OSM allows anyone in the world to edit and add information to the map. This openness is crucial to the project's nature, enabling rapid expansion and updating of data. However, this same openness leads to significant variability in the quality of contributions. Not all users have the same level of skill or access to accurate data, which can result in inconsistent or incorrect information.

2. Community Verification

The verification and review of data in OSM are primarily conducted by the community of users. This creates a system where the accuracy and correctness of data depend on the active vigilance of contributors. Although experienced users review and correct errors, the absence of a formal, centralized review process means errors can persist for undetermined periods.

3. Lack of Centralized Control

OSM does not have a central authority that monitors or validates all changes made to the map. Instead, the platform relies on a decentralized governance model, where control and maintenance of the data are distributed among thousands of contributors worldwide. This decentralization can lead to varying standards of data quality and updates.

4. Diversity of Data Sources

Information in OSM comes from a wide range of sources, including manual user contributions, imports from public databases, and analysis of aerial or satellite imagery. The quality and accuracy of these sources can vary significantly, resulting in a heterogeneous database.

5. Scalability and Limited Resources

Despite the large number of contributors, OSM operates with limited resources compared to commercial mapping projects that can employ dedicated teams for maintenance and quality control. This resource limitation impacts OSM's ability to monitor and correct all changes and contributions quickly.

Example of Using OSM with R

To illustrate how we can access and visualize OSM data, consider an example of an R script that retrieves and maps the roads of Niterói, Rio de Janeiro:
‍

‍

library(osmdata)
library(mapview)
  

‍

# Obtain the bounding box for Niterói, Rio de Janeiro
‍

br_bbox <- getbb("Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro")
  



# Create an Overpass query for roads in Niterói

query <- opq(bbox = br_bbox) %>%
  add_osm_feature(key = "highway")
  

‍

# Extract the data as an sf object

estradas <- osmdata_sf(query)


ruas <- estradas$osm_lines
  

‍

# Visualize the roads on a map
‍

mapview(ruas)
  

Code Explanation

• Libraries:
  • osmdata: A package for interacting with the OSM API and performing Overpass queries.
  • mapview: A package for interactive visualization of spatial data.
• Obtain the Bounding Box:
  • getbb("Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro"): Retrieves the bounding box that defines the geographical area of Niterói.
• Create the Overpass Query:
  • opq(bbox = br_bbox) %>% add_osm_feature(key = "highway"): Creates an Overpass query to fetch elements tagged as highways within the area defined by the bounding box.
• Extract the Data:
  • osmdata_sf(query): Executes the query and returns the data in the sf (simple features) format, suitable for spatial manipulation and analysis in R.
• Visualize the Data:
  • mapview(ruas): Generates an interactive map that visualizes the roads extracted from the OSM query.

Conclusion

OSM can be a powerful tool for collecting and visualizing spatial data, despite its minimally controlled nature. The ability to programmatically access and manipulate this data is one of OSM's significant advantages, enabling a wide range of applications in research, urban planning, and geospatial analysis.

‍